K.Johnson, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN and The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CMP(MD) No.8114 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.SR7687 of 2016 K.JOHNSON, ... APPELLANT/PETITIONER Vs 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, NAGERCOIL.

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PADMANABHAPURAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

3 THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THUCKLAY, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULASEKARAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5 SRI SAPTHAMATHARGAL THIRUKOVIL, REP BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON, VINIL KUMAR, S/O.THANGA NADAR, ARAMANNAM, CHARUPPALOOR POST, KANYAKUMAR DISTRICT.

... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDETNS Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 151 days in re-presenting the Writ Appeal against the order dated 22.12.2015 in W.P.(MD)No.22678 of 2015 in pending disposal of main WA(MD)SR.No.7687 of 2016 and thus render justice.

Prayer in WP(MD). 22678/ 2015 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 4th respondent dated 06.12.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to accord permission and provide police protection to the petitioner s Christmas celebration scheduled on 25.12.2015 at Survey No. 119/4A, Thumbacode Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. N.DILIP KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4, the court made the following order:- [Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.] Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/appellant and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. We are satisfied with the reasons found in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. If the papers are otherwise in order, the Registry is directed to number and list the matter for admission, after printing the name of the respective counsel in the cause-list.

sd/- 16/11/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, NAGERCOIL.

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PADMANABHAPURAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

3 THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THUCKLAY, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULASEKARAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. sm:PV:SAR 3:22/11/2016:2P/5C

ORDER

IN CMP(MD) No.8114 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.SR7687 of 2016 Date :16/11/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/