Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3617/2019disposed of

C. Anjali v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-03-08Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.03.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3617 of 2019 C.Anjali ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnalampatti Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.Sentheepan 4.Eswari ... Respondents Prayer: Petition - filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to provide police protection to the petitioner, her family members and the petitioner's property and based on the representation dated 22.02.2019, morefully to enable the petitioner to undertake the construction activity at her property situated at S.No.1/1. New S.No.680/2, Keelakottai Village, Aathur, Chinnalapatti, Dindigul District, as the building plan approval granted by the Chinnalaptti Town Panchayat's proceedings dated 30.03.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.Swarnam J Rajagopalan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.V.Neelkandan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner claims that she purchased a piece of property in 2017 and she attempted to put up a construction after obtaining necessary permission from the planning authorities. But, the respondents 3 and 4 are interfering and they have also filed O.S.No.369 of 2017 against the petitioner for bare injunction.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has moved this Court seeking police protection and this Court has also granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the police as and when the need arises.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that both the parties have filed separate complaints against each other and both cases were registered based on their complaints and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

investigation is underway.

5. If the petitioner now really holds any threat perception to her life, liberty and right to property, she is at liberty to move the investigating agency and the investigating agency shall hold an enquiry on the same irrespective of the FIRs that are pending against her and her family members for the limited purpose of ascertaining the threat perception of the petitioner to her life, liberty and right to the property and take such appropriate decision to secure the same to the petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnalampatti Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to M/S.SWARNAM J RAJAGOPALAN, Advocate, SR.No.52794 Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3617 of 2019 08.03.2019 SM KK/SAR/02.04.2019/ 2P- 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/