Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17237/2015allowed

S. Jegadeesan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-04Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17237 of 2015 1 S. JEGADEESAN 2 V. CHANDRAN 3 V. RAMAKRISHNAN 4 K. KANNAN 5 M. KARUPPIAH 6 V. SANTHANAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 6 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 88/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.SANTHANAM Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 188 of I.P.C., in Crime No.88 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused had conducted drama on 27.08.2015 without permission from the respondent police.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioners have no bad antecedent.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 04/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,MUKKULAM POLICE STATION,VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S R.SANTHANAM Advocate SR.No.51868.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17237 of 2015 Date :04/09/2015 2P/6C AM/AAL.MPA/AR-I/09.09.2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/