B.Yuvaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Second day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17256 of 2014 B.YUVARAJ ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARUR DIST, CR.NO. 15/2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : M/S. Karthik Subramanian Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 341, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.

15 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.One Veluchamy lodged a complaint alleging that he pledged 13/1-2 of gold jewels to the accused, but they did not return them. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel further submitted that one year ago, the wife of the de-facto complainant lodged a similar complaint and the same was closed after proper enquiry and this is the second complaint. It is further submitted that earlier the matter was referred to mediation centre, but the medication could not succeed. 4.

The learned counsel appearing for the intervener vehemently opposed this petition contenting that the accused have cheated the de-facto complainant and they also agreed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- before the Mediation, but they did not keep up their words. 5.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the interim anticipatory bail already granted to the petitioner, dated

16.09.2014 is made regular. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 02/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KARUR.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate SR.No. 26259. TS/09.07.2015/2P -6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17256 of 2014 Date :02/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/