← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2251/2021dismissed as infructuous

Narendran. P v. The Superintendent Engineer

2021-02-11Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.2251 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.02.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD).No.2251 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.1874 & 1877 of 2021 P.Narendran ... Petitioner Vs.

The Superintendent Engineer, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Tirunelveli.

.. Respondent PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records pertaining to the order of suspension issued by the respondent vide his Memo No.029116/361/ADM-IV/A.1/F.

Suspension/2020, dated 29.12.2020 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondent : Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran Standing Counsel

O R D E R

Heard Mr.R.Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent.

2.The order of suspension, suspending the petitioner from his service, is put under challenge in the present writ petition. After getting instructions, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioner had been terminated from his service on 10.02.2021. As such, no effective orders can be passed in the present writ petition, challenging the suspension order. Accordingly, the prayer has also become infructuous. 3.It is needless to mention that in case the petitioner chooses to challenge the termination order, he may do so in accordance with law.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.2251 of 2021 4.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Writs) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

+1 CC to Mr.T.SAKTHIKUMARAN, Advocate ( SR-4526[F] dated 11/02/2021 ) W.P.(MD).No.2251 of 2021 11.02.2021 VB (24.02.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2