Sathasivam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventeenth day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.735 of 2018 SATHASIVAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAPPARAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.13 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.PRABU, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARTHI, Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC and Section 21 (1) Mines and Minerals Regulation Act in Crime No.13 of 2018 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that 3 units of river sand were transported illegally by using tipper lorry by the petitioner herein.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is no way connected with the offences, and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner herein is arrayed as A2, who is the owner of the tipper lorry and the tipper lorry was seized by the respondent Police. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending. 5.The submissions made by the learned counsel on either side are considered. This case has been registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC and Section 21 (1) Mines and Minerals Regulation Act. During the time of occurrence, 3 units of river sand were transported illegally by using tipper lorry owned by the petitioner. As of now, the said property was recovered by the investigating agency. Accordingly, custodial interrogation is not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

necessary for completing the investigation. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.7,000/- to the credit of Crime No.13 of 2018 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai. 6.Taking all the above said aspects into consideration and having regard to the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 17/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAPPARAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.PRABU Advocate SR.No.774 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.735 of 2018 Date :17/01/2018 MS/PM-PN/SAR.4/22.01.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/