Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17431/2015disposed of

R. Pitchai v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-11Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17431 of 2015 1 R. PITCHAI 2 K. PALANI 3 V. DEIVAM @ Deivendran 4 K. SAMPATH 5 A. RAMAN 6 P. LINGAM 7 MATHIYAVARNAM 8 KARUPPUSAMY 9 KANNAN 10 TAMILSELVAN 11 CHANDRAN 12 IRULANDI@ELANGO 13 MUTHUKUMAR@IRRULANDI 14 MUTHURAMAN 15 PALANISAMY 16 DINESH 17 SUBRAMANIAN 18 ARUMUGAM 19 MUTHALAGU 20 MUTHURATHINAM 21 VEERANAN 22 GANESAN 23 MUTHALAGU 24 SANTHANAM 25 VELUCHAMY ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE A.MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, THIRUCHULI TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S V.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.

438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w. Section 109 of I.P.C. r/w. Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.89 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to temple festival dispute, the petitioners' group scolded the de-facto complainant's group with filthy language and attacked with deadly weapons and caused injuries.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that this is a case of case and counter and the injured has been discharged from the hospital, however, tension is prevailing in that area.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arupukottai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall stay at Madurai and appear before the S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 11/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPUKOTTAI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUTHUNAGAR DISTRICT. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, A.MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, THIRUCHULI TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

S.S.Colony POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

+4. CCS to M/S V.PERUMAL Advocate SR.No.53682

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17431 of 2015 Date :11/09/2015 NS/AMF/SAR I/15.09.2015 : 2P/10C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/