Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1747/2015ordered

M.Vinoth v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-02-03Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.1747 of 2015 M.VINOTH ..PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUTHIYAMPUTHUR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CR. NO.11/2015.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.BANUPRASATH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.11 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that this petitioner is a B.E., graduate and the de-facto complainant is none other than his own father. It is alleged that the de-facto complainant married one Manimegalai for the 2nd time, after the death of this petitioner's mother. There appears to be a dispute between the father and son on account of which, this case has been registered against this petitioner.

3. Under such circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions.

4. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Thoothukudi, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed

and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 03/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, THOOTHUKUDI. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHIYAMPUTHUR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.BANUPRASATH Advocate SR.No.4841 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1747 of 2015 Date :03/02/2015 PBK 05/02/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/