← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17487/2015allowed

Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-09Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17487 of 2015 RAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REB.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.8 OF 2014) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.R.KANNAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 294(b) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.8 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others demanded 25 sovereign of gold jewels and Rs.5 lakhs as additional dowry and also harassed the de-facto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that after completion of investigation, the respondent police filed a charge sheet, which was taken on file in C.C.No.81 of 2015.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court for all hearing dates without fail, except on those days by filing a petition under Section 317 of Cr.P.C, by assigning valid reasons. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 09/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 RAMANATHAPURAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S A.R.KANNAPPAN Advocate SR.No.53202.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17487 of 2015 Date :09/09/2015 2P/6C AM/GSV.PM/SAR-I/10.09.2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/