Murugan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17503 of 2015 1 MURUGAN 2 THIRUPATHI 3 AMSAVALLI 4 RASAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs.
STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUZHUDHIPATTY POLICE STATION, (IN CR.NO. 99 OF 2015), SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 441, 447 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.99 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel arose between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant with regard to land dispute, the de-facto complainant lodged a complaint against them.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 09/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI.
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUZHUDHIPATTY POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to MR.NA.PALANIYANDI Advocate SR.No.53031 Akm/11.09.2015 /2p-6c/
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17503 of 2015 Date :09/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/