Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/929/2018ordered

Chandran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-01-29Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.929 of 2018 CHANDRAN, ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EMANESWARAM POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO.9 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.MATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC., in Crime No.9 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 13.01.2018, due to previous motive, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant by using bricks, caused injuries and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case has been registered for the above said occurrence.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent on instructions would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending.

5. The submissions made by the learned counsel on either side

are considered. It is alleged that due to previous enmity, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant. According to the prosecution, the person, who sustained injury during the time of alleged occurrence was discharged from the hospital after completing treatment. Further, except the offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC., all other petition mentioned offences are bailable in nature. Hence, custodial interrogation may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Therefore, considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with stringent conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramnad District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(iv) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 29/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI, RAMNAD DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EMANESWARAM POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.K.MATHAN Advocate SR.No.1525

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.929 of 2018 Date :29/01/2018 SMA/PM-PN/SAR-1/01.02.2018:3P/6c