Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17537/2015allowed

Ramar Prakash v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-09-11Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17537 of 2015 1 RAMAR PRAKASH 2 LAXMAN PRASAD ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYANAYAKKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 339 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 354(D), 355 and 506(i) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.339 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences and brutally attacked him.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 11/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDUGAL DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYANAYAKKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.54240.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17537 of 2015 Date :11/09/2015 AM/15.09.2015/GSV.PM/SAR-I/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/