Dedorhl Esther, v. Balaraj,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2018 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Crl.R.C.(MD) No.106 of 2018 Dedorhl Esther ... Petitioner vs.

Balaraj ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the judgment dated 02.11.2017 made in C.A.No.54 of 2016 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Thoothukudi confirming the judgment dated 06.10.2016 made in C.C.No.192 of 2015 on the file of the learned Fast Track Court (Magistrate Level) Thoothukudi by allowing the above revision.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan for M/s.Veera Associates For Respondent : Mr.P.Prasanna

ORDER

Heard Mr.C.Jeganathan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Prasanna, learned counsel for the respondent. 2.Both the parties are present today (13.04.2018) before this Court.

3.Both the learned counsel submitted that the parties entered into compromise and the compromise memo was also filed before this Court. The learned counsel appearing for both sides and their parties signed in the compromise memo.

4.In view of the aforesaid submission and as per the terms of the compromise memo, this petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) /True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar

Encl.: Xerox copy of Compromise Memo To

1. The II Additional and District Judge, Thoothukudi.

2. The Judge, Fast Track Court, Thoothukudi.

MM TE/JC/SAR-3 : 02/05/2018 : 2P/3C Crl.R.C.(MD) No.106 of 2018 13.04.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/