Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17690/2015disposed of

Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-11Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17690 of 2015 1 ARUMUGAM 2 PANCHAMMAL 3 RAMAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERIYODU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.369 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.RAJINI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.369 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners abused the de-facto complainant with filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that this is a case of case and counter and no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedachandur, Dindigul District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 11/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDACHANDUR, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERIYODU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S A.RAJINI Advocate SR.No.53728 RL/6 C- 16/9/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17690 of 2015 Date :11/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/