Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4116/2019disposed of

Arjunan, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-03-19Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.03.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4116 of 2019 1.Arjunan 2.Kalaiselvi 3.Chinnaraja ... Petitioners /Vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kallal Police Station, Kallal, Sivagangai District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Alagappapuram Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

5.Natarajan ... Respondents Prayer: Petition - filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the 1st petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2019. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Muthukumar For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.V.Neelkandan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the 1st petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2019.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that there is love affair between the 3rd petitioner and the 5th

respondent's daughter and that the respondent police are harassing the petitioners at the instance of the fifth respondent.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that a complaint was preferred by the fifth respondent and the same is being enquired in current paper. He further submitted that summon was issued to both parties and petition enquiry was conducted and it was closed on 15.03.2019. He added that the respondent police have not harassed the petitioners and they have no intention to harass them.

5. The statement of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded.

6. In such circumstances, if at all the respondent police requires the presence of the petitioners for any preliminary enquiry / interrogation, they shall issue summons mentioning specific date and time for enquiry and during enquiry, there shall not be harassment. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) sm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kallal Police Station, Kallal, Sivagangai District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Alagappapuram Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.S.MUTHUKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-55815[F] dated 21/03/2019 ) Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4116 of 2019 Dated:

19.03.2019 DS/ /SAR- (12.04.2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/