← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4152/2019disposed of

Sivakami, W/O.Sakthivel v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2019-03-20Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4152 of 2019 Sivakami ... Petitioner /Vs./

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Karur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kulithalai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Mayanur Police Station, Karur District.

4.Suriya ... Respondents Prayer: Petition - filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the first respondent to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner based upon the representation sent by the petitioner dated 13.03.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthilkumar For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.V.Neelkandan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner seeks protection from harassment of the third respondent presumably at the instance of the fourth respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the fourth respondent has preferred a complaint, which is pending in C.S.R.No.31 of 2019 and it discloses that there is an ongoing love affair between the fourth respondent and the petitioner's son. The third respondent has neither harassed the petitioner nor intended to harass him. The said statement of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Inasmuch as both the petitioner's son and the fourth respondent are majors, the petitioner may have little to do with any complaint, which the fourth respondent might have given viz-a-viz her love for the petitioner's son. Therefore, the third respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner.

5. If at all the third respondent requires the petitioner for any preliminary enquiry / interrogation in connection with the complaint disclosing the commission of any offence, then the same shall be done on summons under Section 41 A Cr.P.C., mentioning a specific date and time for enquiry and also giving reasonable time for him to travel to the venue of such enquiry. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the enquiry. During enquiry, there shall not be harassment to the petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

sd/ Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Karur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kulithalai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Mayanur Police Station, Karur District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.R.SENTHIL KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-55406[F] dated 20/03/2019 ) SM AE/22.04.2019/2P/6C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4152 of 2019 20.03.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/