V.S.Vijaya Nandakumar v. L.K.M.Seyed Rabia

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24.09.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.1614, 1616, 1619, 1621, 1625, 1626 and 1627 of 2024 C.R.P.(MD)No.345 of 2024:- V.S.Vijaya Nandakumar ... Petitioner / Respondent Vs.

L.K.M.Seyed Rabia ... Respondent / Applicant Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the case in R.L.T.O.P.No.42 of 2023 on the file of the Ist Additional District Munsif Court, Trichy and strike off the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Vakeeswaran For Respondent : Mr.M.Saravanan * * * COMMON ORDER The revision petitioners are tenants. L.K.M.Seyed Rabia, W/o.M.S.A.Sahul Hameed is the landlady. She filed petitions under the 1/4

provisions of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 against the revision petitioners for eviction. The case of the revision petitioners is that since both the parties have not come forward for executing a registered tenancy agreement, the eviction petitions are not maintainable. On this ground, the revision petitioners want this Court to strike off the eviction petitions.

2.The remedy under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be lightly invoked. The petitioners are very much having the remedy before the Rent Controller. They can as well urge this point and invite a finding. If it is adverse, further remedies are available under the statute. It is not necessary for the High Court to invoke its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at this stage.

3.Leaving open all the contentions of the revision petitioners, the civil revision petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

24.09.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ias 2/4

To:

The I Additional District Munsif Court, Trichirappalli.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 24.09.2024 4/4