Ahamed Yasin, v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.4350 of 2019 AHAMED YASIN, ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, (CRIME NO.42/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR. G. VISHNURAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 353 and 506 (i) of IPC in Cr.No.42 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The defacto complainant is the Revenue Inspector. The case of the prosecution when the defacto complainant was in duty doing vehicle check up, he found knife along with some fruits and when the same was questioned, there was a wordy quarrel. Hence the complaint 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is an innocent person. He would also submit that the petitioner has kept the knife only for cutting the fruits. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that investigation is pending. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also
considering the fact that there seems only some wordy quarrel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders;
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 22/03/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to MR. G. VISHNURAM Advocate SR.No.5437
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.4350 of 2019 Date :22/03/2019 AE/MMS/SAR-IV/26.03.2019/3P/6C