Prabhu v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.4501 of 2019 PRABHU ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHITRAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 55 OF 2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR. D.R.MURUGESAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa) and 4(1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Cr.No.55 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 110 litres of spirit and hence, a case has been registered against the petitioner.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is an innocent person. However, on instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of the Rajaji Government Hospital at Madurai, for the welfare of the alcohol addicted persons without prejudice to their defence before the trial Court.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail. However, anticipatory bail may grant by imposing stringent conditions.
5.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner with a condition that the petitioner shall deposit jointly a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the credit of the Rajaji Government Hospital at Madurai for giving treatment to the alcohol addict persons. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) petitioner shall deposit jointly a sum of Rs.
(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 p.m., until further orders;
(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 26/03/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI,THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHITRAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
4 ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
COPY TO THE DEAN, RAJAJI GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, MADURAI.
+1. CC to Mr. D.R.MURUGESAN Advocate SR.No.5557 PS/VR/SAR-4/28.03.2019/3P/7C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.4501 of 2019 Date :26/03/2019