Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18094/2015allowed

Gopal v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-29Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.18094 of 2015 1 GOPAL 2 SAKTHIVEL 3 PERUMAL @ ARUMUGAPERUMAL 4 MURUGAN @ JEYAMURUGAN 5 ULAGAMMAL 6 RAMALAKSHMI ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 6 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SERAKULAM POLICE STATION, TUTHOOKUDI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 55 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S M.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.55 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 09.09.2015, the petitioners scolded the de-facto complainant with obscene words and also beat him.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured had been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners No.1 to 4 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders and the Petitioners No.5 and 6 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SERAKULAM POLICE STATION, TUTHOOKUDI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S M.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.57252 Akm/30.09.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18094 of 2015 Date :29/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/