Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2017/2020dismissed as infructuous

Anandakumar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2022-03-07Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2017 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.03.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2017 of 2020 in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1019 of 2020

1. Anandakumar

2. Karuppaiah

3. Sornam

4. Abirami ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Taluk Police Station, Madurai District.

(In Crime No.282 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant 2.Alagarsamy ...2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.to call for the records of the case in Crime No.282 of 2019 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same in respect of the petitioners.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Selvam For R1 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the entire records connected with the impugned F.I.R in Crime No. 282 of 2019 dated 04.11.2021 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the respondent police completed investigation in Crime No. 282 of 2019 and also filed final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti on 19.11.2020, but not yet taken on file.

3. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2017 of 2020 dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the final report, in the manner known to law, if so advised. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PNM Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Taluk Police Station, Madurai District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2017 of 2020 in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1019 of 2020 07.03.2022 RD(24.03.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2