V.Kalimuthu, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of November Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL MP(MD) No.10707 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.14963 of 2017 V.KALIMUTHU ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE THROUGH, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO.360 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the petitioners absence in complying with the condition imposed by this Honourable court vide order in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14963 of 2017 dated 06.11.2017 from 17.11.2017 to till today. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.MALAIKANI, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:- The Petitioner filed this petition for condoning the absence of the petitioner. On 06.11.2017, this Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14963 of 2017, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, daily between 10.00 a.m., and 11.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks, but the petitioner did not comply with the condition. Hence, he prayed for condoning his absence.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the petitioner appeared before the respondent police to report as per the condition imposed by this Court, the Inspector of Police scolded the petitioner in filthy language and also threatened him. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is not complying with the condition regularly.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, though not convinced the reasons given by the petitioner for condoning the absence of the petitioner as directed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14963 of 2017, however, for giving one more opportunity to the petitioner, absence of the petitioner is condoned. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/- 27/11/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KOVILPATTI. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.10707 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.14963 of 2017 Date :27/11/2017 (1/2) PK/RR/SAR-1/06.12.2017 : 2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/