R.Selvam @ Gnanaselvam v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.4676 of 2019 R.SELVAM @ GNANASELVAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REP. BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTCHIPULI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.78 OF 2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate(Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147,148, 341, 342, 294(b),323,324 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Cr.No.78 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.It is the case of the prosecution that due to wordy quarrel the petitioner abused the defacto complainant, assaulted him and threatened with dire consequences. Hence the complaint 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he is an innocent person.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that injured has been discharged from the hospital 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders;
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 28/03/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTCHIPULI POLICE STATION,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to MR.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.5745 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.4676 of 2019 Date :28/03/2019 MSI/PN/SAR 3/01.04.2019/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/