Sukkuru v. The Insepector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.18188 of 2015 1 SUKKURU 2 RAMAR 3 MALAR @ MALARKKODI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1,2 & 6 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.135/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.PALANI RAJA Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A1,A2 and A6 in Crime No.135 of 2015, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147,294(b),323,324 and 506(ii) of IPC r/w. Section 4 of TNWH Act, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners have attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that A3 to A5 were arrested and released on bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, Trichy District, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The third petitioner being a lady shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 21/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.M.PALANI RAJA Advocate SR.No.55542. TS/23.09.2015/2P - 6C GSV-PM/SAR -II

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18188 of 2015 Date :21/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/