Arumugam v. The Inspetor Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.1820 of 2015 1 ARUMUGAM 2 KARUPPUSAMY @ KARUPPIAH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 5 & 8 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPETOR OF POLICE SAANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

CR.NO.26 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.26 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 342, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that A1 attacked the defacto complainant with knife and it is alleged that this petitioner had restrained the de-facto complainant.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) that co-accused had been arrested by the police and there is no previous case as against these petitioners and the injured have been discharged from the hospital.

4. Under such circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.III, Dindigul, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day twice at 10.30 a.m. and 6.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), whether these petitioners are complying with the order or not.

sd/- 03/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,DINDIGUL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPETOR OF POLICE, SAANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.SASIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.5218

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1820 of 2015 Date :03/02/2015 AA/05.02.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/