Vino, S/O. Savarimuthu v. The Sub Inspector Of Police,

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.[MD]No.4792 of 2019 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.2946 of 2019 Vino : Petitioner Vs.

1.The State represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mandaikadu Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.228 of 2015) 2.Leema : Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Cr.No.228 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Russelraja For R1 : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ***

ORDER

The petitioner has moved this petition to quash the FIR in Cr.No.228 of 2015 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police, which was filed for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 294B, 506(i) of IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the Proctection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police. 3.The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, submitted that the final report has been laid in this case on 28.08.2017, but, it is not yet taken on file.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Since the final report stated to have been filed, nothing survives in this petition. Hence, the criminal original petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the final report, if there are grounds, in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) cmr To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mandaikadu Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.4792 of 2019 02.04.2019 KK/SAR/08.05.2019/ 2P- 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/