Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/506/2026disposed of

Dinesh v. The Superintendent Of Police

2026-02-02Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.Crl.(MD) No. 506 of 2026 Dinesh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai Division, Tiruchirappalli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Manaparai Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.

4.The Tahsildar, Manaparai, Tiruchirappalli District.

5.Palanisamy 6.Thangarasu Gounder 7.Pugazhenthi 8.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Manapparai Taluk, Srirangam, Trichy District.

... Respondents (R8 is suo motu impleaded by this Court vide order dated 02.02.2026 in W.P.Crl.(MD).No.506 of 2026)

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action against the respondents 5 to 7 based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025 and 19.12.2025 in accordance with law.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan For Respondents :Mr.A.S.Abul Kaalam Azad, (for R1 to R3) Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr.M.Muthumanikkam (for R4 and R8) Government Advocate (Civil Side) Mr.A.Lourduraj (for R5)

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action against the respondents 5 to 7 based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2025 and 19.12.2025 in accordance with law. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, learned Government Advocate (Civil Side) appearing for the respondents 4 and 8 and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.

3.On perusal of the complaint, since the issue relates to the offering of Parivattam and Nattanamai, the matter is referred to the RDO. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Manapparai Taluk, Srirangam, Trichy District is suo impleaded as eighth respondent in this petition. 4.Therefore, the newly impleaded eighth respondent/RDO is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 to 7 and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In case any disputed questions of fact arise and the matter cannot be resolved, the parties are directed to approach the concerned civil Court.

5.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

02.02.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes vsg

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai Division, Tiruchirappalli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Manaparai Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.

4.The Tahsildar, Manaparai, Tiruchirappalli District.

5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Manapparai Taluk, Srirangam, Trichy District.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J vsg W.P.Crl.(MD) No. 506 of 2026 02.02.2026