Abibunnisa Mohamed Hanifa, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.484 of 2019 1.ABIBUNNISA MOHAMED HANIFA, 2 RABIYATHUL BASIRIYA, 3 NAJUNNISHA, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIRANGAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.Not known of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The contention of the petitioners is that the defacto complainant is the daughter in law of the first petitioner. The first petitioner's son and the defacto complainant got married on 09.09.2018. After three months, the husband of the defacto complainant / son of the first left to Dubai for his job. Since he did not contact with the defacto complainant, she made a false https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ allegation that the petitioners were demanding more dowry and ill

treated her.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that there is no complaint as on date.

4.Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

sd/- 10/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIRANGAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.484 of 2019 Date :10/01/2019 AE/JC/SAR3/23.01.2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/