Ramar, S/O.Ramasamy, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of April Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.4863 of 2019 1 RAMAR 2 MUTHAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No. 2 & 3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.10 OF 2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.JEYKARTHIK, Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.CHANDRASEKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody since 11.03.2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 9,10,11 of Child Marriage Restraint Act 2006 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.10 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The petitioners herein are the parents of the victim. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between A1 and the victim was arranged by the consent of both the parents. However, the same was informed to the Social Welfare Officer, thereafter the Social Welfare Officer registered a complaint before the respondent police. Thereafter the victim girl was secured and sent to home. 3.The learned for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have three daughters, thereby they performed marriage , however later they came to know the child marriage is against the Act. He would also submit that petitioners are innocent persons. Accordingly, he prayed for bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the state would submit that investigation is pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of incarceration and also considering the fact that the petitioners are parents of the victims, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood related surety, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Mahila Court, Thoothukudi and on further condition that: (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the concerned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily as and when required for interrogation; (c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

sd/- 01/04/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDGE MAHILA COURT, THOOTHUKUDI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE DISTRICT JAIL, PERURANI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, KOKKARAKULAM, WOMEN SUB JAIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to MR.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.5907

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4863 of 2019 Date :01/04/2019 MSI/PN/SAR 3/01.04.2019/3P-7C