Porkamalam v. Dhanasekaran

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.03.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.1325 and 1326 of 2024 1.Porkamalam 2.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioners/Plaintiffs in both petitions Vs.

1.Dhanasekaran 2.Panjavarnam 3.Selva Rani 4.Murugesa Pandian 5.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Bye Pass Road, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

6.The Joint Sub-Registrar No.II, Chutchery Road, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

7.The Commissioner, Office of the Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Office Road, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents/Defendants in Both petitions 1/4

COMMON PRAYER : Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 27.09.2023, made in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2023, in O.S.No.19 of 2020 on the file of the District Munsif, Virudhunagar. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan For Respondents : Mr.M.Jothi Basu, for R1 to R4 Mr.A.Sivanu Pandian for R5 & R6 Government Advocate (Civil)

ORDER

This revision petitions have been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 27.09.2023, made in I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2023, in O.S.No.19 of 2020 on the file of the District Munsif, Virudhunagar. 2.The above said interlocutory applications have been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to examine the respondents 5 to 7 and to mark relevant documents available with them. But, the same was dismissed by the trial Court stating that the petitioner can file the certified copies of the above said documents. 2/4

3.The learned Government Advocate has verified that both the documents are now available with the competent authority. The learned counsel for the private respondents has no objection. So the order passed by the trial Court required to be interfered and accordingly interfered. 4.The petitions filed by the petitioner are allowed and permission is granted to the petitioner to sent for both the documents along with the copies. The competent person must also be examined as witnesses to prove the factual aspects mentioned by the petitioner. 5.With the above said directions, these civil revision petitions stand allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

19.03.2024 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No TM To 1.The District Munsif, Virudhunagar.

2.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

TM 19.03.2024 4/4