Shiyam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.18348 of 2015 1 SHIYAM 2 RANJITH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.2&3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 439 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 & 2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 511 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.439 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. He further submitted that A1 was arrested and released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sathankulam.

3 It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 4 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sattankulam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, until further orders.

The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 02/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SATTANKULAM 2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4 THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.64337 JAM /03/11/2015/NGM-SS/SAR I /2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18348 of 2015 Date :02/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/