Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18411/2015ordered

Puvanendran v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-09-25Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.18411 of 2015 PUVANENDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 67 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S RISHI ASSOCIATES For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.67 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and threatened with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant. He would further submit that it is the case of case and counter.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondents.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathoor, Ramnad District, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 25/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUDUKULATHOOR, RAMNAD DISTRICT.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S RISHI ASSOCIATES SR.No.56603 Akm/30.09.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18411 of 2015 Date :25/09/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/