Seenu@Srinivasan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.18472 of 2015 SEENU@SRINIVASAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.9 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DT., (CRIME NO. 227/2014) (INVESTIGATION BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DT.,) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.9 in Crime No.227 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, was arrested on 22.08.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 362, 397, 120(b) and 414 of I.P.C., and hence, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused way laid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.26,86,000/-.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is the driver of A1's vehicle. It is further submitted that the main accused A1 was already released on bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14944 of 2015 dated 25.08.2015 and A3 to A5 were also released on anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18061 of 2015 dated 19.09.2015.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District and on further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

sd/- 25/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II KOVILPATTI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON PALAYAMKOTTAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ETTAIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DT., (INVESTIGATION BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DT.,) 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.56653.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18472 of 2015 Date :25/09/2015 AM/25.09.2015/GSV.PM/SAR-II/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/