N. Narayanasamy v. The Supereindent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18581 of 2015 N.Narayanasamy ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Town Range, Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul District.

4. Senthilkumar ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the second and third respondents and their subordinates not to harass or ill-treat the petitioner to demolish the wall constructed in shop No.32, Shopping Complex, A.M.C. Road, Stalin Cottage, Dindigul at the instigation of the fourth respondents.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr. P.Kannithevan Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R.1 to R.3

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second and third respondents and their subordinates not to harass or illtreat the petitioner to demolish the wall constructed in shop No.32, Shopping Complex, A.M.C. Road, Stalin Cottage, Dindigul at the instigation of the fourth respondents.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 to 3.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent Police frequently called the petitioner to the Police Station and harassed him under the guise of enquiry in respect of a civil dispute.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that petitioner was called only for enquiry in respect of a petition pending against him given by one Senthilkumar and not to decide the civil rights of the parties in the Police Station and that the respondent Police did not cause any harassment to the petitioner and his family members. However, he gave an undertaking that if at all the presence of the petitioner is required, the respondent would call the petitioner for enquiry only after issuing summons giving specific date, time and place. 5.Recording the above undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(Records) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Town Range, Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18581 of 2015 15.11.2016 ssl msm/ss2/09.12.16/p2/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/