← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18630/2015disposed of

M. Karthick v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-09-29Honourable Ms. Justice R.Mala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.18630 of 2015 M.Karthick : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

: Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the first respondent to forward the petitioner's complaint dated 28.08.2015 to the second respondent for register the case and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Court and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents :Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, directing the first respondent to forward the petitioner's complaint dated 28.08.2015 to the second respondent for register the case and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the respondent police as early as on 28.08.2015, but, however, the respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the two complaints given by the petitioner in Current Paper C.No.G7/3977/ 52313/15, petition enquiry is going on.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the respondent police is directed to expedite the enquiry and follow the

dictum laid down in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC) and register a case, if any cognizable offence is made out.

5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Sd/- The Assistant Registrar(co) /True copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

sm:IV:08.10.2015:2P/5c Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18630 of 2015 Dated:- 29.09.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/