← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2946/2025disposed of

K.Murugan v. The Commissioner Of Madurai City

2025-02-03Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.Murugan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Commissioner of Madurai City Office of the Corporation Commissioner Peraringnar Anna Hall Tallakulam Madurai-625 002 2.The Commissioner of Police Madurai City South Gate, Alagar Kovil Main Road Reserve Line, K.Pudur Madurai City-625 002 3.Inspector of Police Keerathurai Police Station Madurai-625 001 4.P.Krishnamoorthy 5.Murugan ... Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate appropriate legal actions against the respondents 4 and 5 subsequently to closure the illegal cattle house situated at 177-1, Kamachi Amman Kovil Street, Kannan Colony, Chinthamani, Madurai-625 009, based on the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2024 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents :

Mr.K.K.Kannan Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2 & R3

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the cattle house that is being maintained by the respondents 4 and 5 at the premises bearing No.177-I, Kamachi Amman Kovil Street, Kannan Colony, Chinthamani, Madurai, basing upon his representation dated 30.11.2024.

2. Complaining inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 3 on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Mr.K.K.Kannan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent, brought to the notice of this Court that basing upon the previous representation submitted by the petitioner, appropriate action has already been initiated and a final notice dated 05.10.2024, has been served on the respondents 4 and 5 and appropriate action would be taken within a short time.

4. Considering the fact that the first respondent has already initiated action basing on the previous representation submitted by the petitioner and a final notice dated 05.10.2024 is also stated to have been served on the respondents 4 and 5, this Court does not find any reason to entertain this writ petition complaining inaction against the respondents 1 to

3. However, it would be appropriate to fix some time frame for conclusion of the action initiated by the first respondent.

5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to conclude the action that has already been initiated by him by issuing a final notice dated 05.10.2024 to the respondents 4 and 5, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 03.02.2025 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No krk To:

1.The Commissioner of Madurai City, Office of the Corporation Commissioner, Peraringnar Anna Hall, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 002.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, South Gate, Alagar Kovil Main Road, Reserve Line, K.Pudur, Madurai City-625 002.

3.The Inspector of Police, Keerathurai Police Station, Madurai-625 001.

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

krk 03.02.2025