S.Kannan v. The District Collector
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.8422 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7960 of 2018 S.Kannan ... Petitioner vs.
1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector Sivagangai District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruppathur Taluk Thiruppathur Sivagangai District.
3. The Tahsildhar Thirupathur Taluk Office, Sivagangai District.
4. The Tahsildhar'
Singampuneri Taluk Sivagangai District
5. P.Pandyan
6. S. Ravichandran
7. V.Karuppaiah
8. S.Kesavan
9. S.Machakalai
10. P.Balakumar
11. K.Muthaia @ Bhaskar
12. B.Muralidharan
13. B.Saravanan
14. S.Pillappan
15. K.Kalidass Yadav
16.K.Periyasamy
17. A.L.Muthiah (temple poosari)
18. S.P.Natarajan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to consider his representation directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to consider his representation dated 13.03.2018 and to prevent the conduct of Vellipooja on 7th and 8th June 2018 or any other date by the proposed respondents 5 to 18 and to recall the oral ex - communication order passed against his and his family members.
For Petitioner :
Mr.A.J.Ajmalkhan Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Shakul Hameed For Respondents :
Mr.N.Shanmuga Selvam No.1 to 4 Additional Government Pleader For Respondents No 14 & 15:Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent No.18 :Mr.P.Edin Brough
O R D E R
The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to consider his representation dated 13.03.2018 and to prevent to conduct Vellipooja on 7th and 8th June 2018 or any other date by the proposed respondents 5 to 18 and to recall the oral ex- communication order passed against him and his family members
2. Today (05.06.2018), when the matter is called, it is brought to my notice that in connection with the dispute the fourth respondent herein had already initiated peace talks and the petitioner as well as the private respondents herein were also participated in the same. When the fourth respondent had seized of the matter and has initiated peace talks, it would not be appropriate for this Court to interfere with the proceedings but rather to permit the fourth respondent to arrive at amicable settlement to the dispute. Since the festival is scheduled to function on 07.06.2018, it would be appropriate that the peace meeting is to be completed on or before 06.06.2018.
3. In the result, there shall be a direction to the fourth respondent to complete the peace meeting on or before 06.06.2018 and during the course of meeting, the fourth respondent shall
ensure that due opportunity is being given to the petitioner as well as to the respondents 5 to 18 herein and any other persons who may be interested in the subject matter.
4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/ Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector Sivagangai District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruppathur Taluk Thiruppathur Sivagangai District.
3. The Tahsildhar Thirupathur Taluk Office, Sivagangai District.
4. The Tahsildhar'
Singampuneri Taluk Sivagangai District.
+2cc to Mr.M.SHAKUL HAMEED, Advocate, SR.No.66667 +2cc to Mr.A.SARAVANAN, Advocate, SR.No. 66655,66656 W.P.(MD) No.8422 of 2018 05.06.2018 AAV KK/SKN RSK/SAR-2/05.06.2018/3P-9C