N.Vadivel v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.1867 of 2015 N.VADIVEL ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.207/2014 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.THIRUMAL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC in Crime No. 207 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is submitted that Section 107 Cr.P.C proceeding is pending against the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Due to wordy altercation between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, complaint has been lodged and no one was seriously injured.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner shall stay at Uchizhiyamparai, Dindigul District and shall appear before the Uchizhiyamparai Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 04/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO. I, KARUR 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.
5.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, UCHIZHIYAMPARAI POLICE STATION UCHIZHIYAMPARAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.V.THIRUMAL Advocate SR.No.5153 RL/7 C- 6/2/2015
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.1867 of 2015 Date :04/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/