Konnamuthu v. The Secretary
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1763 & 1783 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.12888 of 2023 W.M.P.(MD)No.1763 of 2025 Konnamuthu
...Petitioner/
Proposed 6th respondent Vs ...1 to 4 Respondents/Respondents
5. K.Murugan
6. Thirumaran
7. Sabari Manikandan
8. Bose 1/4
9. Kannan
10. Karnan
11. Manivannan ...5 to 11 Respondents/ writ petitioners
12. Dhanasekaran ...12th respondent/proposed 5th respondent PRAYER: Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to implead petitioner as a proposed party 6th respondent in the above said writ petition in W.P.(MD).No.12888 of 2023 pending on the file of this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balamurugapandi For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate for R1 to R4 W.M.P.(MD)No.1783 of 2025 Dhanasekaran
...Petitioner/
proposed 5th respondent Vs ...1 to 4 Respondents/Respondents
5. K.Murugan 2/4
6. Thirumaran
7. Sabari Manikandan
8. Bose
9. Kannan
10. Karnan
11. Manivannan ...5 to 11 Respondents/ writ petitioners PRAYER: Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to implead petitioner as a proposed party 5th respondent in the above said writ petition in W.P.(MD).No.12888 of 2023 pending on the file of this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balamurugapandi For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate for R1 to R4 COMMON ORDER These two impleading petitions have been filed by persons who had applied for a free house site patta and whose request has not been granted till date. Such persons have to pursue independent remedies. Therefore, these impleading petitions are rejected.
16.10.2025 4/4 3/4
RJR SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY , J.
RJR To W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1763 & 1783 of 2025 in W.P(MD)No.12888 of 2023 16.10.2025 4/4 4/4