Ramakrishnan, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ CRL OP(MD) No.20601 of 2016 RAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THILAGAR THIDAL POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. (CRIME NO.1038/2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.MAHENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.09.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477(A) of Indian Penal Code in Crime No.1038 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner created a forged document and swindled huge amount.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the offence and he has been implicated in this case.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and on further condition that: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[a] the petitioner shall stay at Thanjavur and appear before Swamimalai Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the Office of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not.

sd/- 26/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SWAMIMALAI POLICE STATION THANJAVUR DISTRICT 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI 6.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THILAGAR THIDAL POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. +1. CC to M/S.K.MAHENDRAN Advocate SR.No.63689 RL/8C/2P/GSV/PM/SARI/26.10.2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20601 of 2016 Date :26/10/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/