Natarajan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of September Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.18786 of 2015 1 NATARAJAN 2 LINGESHWARI 3 SANTHOSHKUMAR 4 SANTHIYA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 360 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S K.MATHAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as accused No.1 to 4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147,148,294(b),323,427 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.360 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindugal https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 & 2 shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 3 and 4 being ladies shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/09/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S K.MATHAN Advocate SR.No.57709

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18786 of 2015 Date :30/09/2015 rg.01.10.2015/sk/skn//SAR-I 2P/6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/