Silambarasu v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.2230 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/03/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.2230 of 2022 Silambarasu, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused -VsState Rep.by The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Trichy District.

Cr.No.1 of 2022.

...Respondent/Complainant

Midhun Shamesh, ... 2nd Respondent (R2 is suo-motu impleaded as per order of this Hon'ble Court dated 16.02.2022 in Crl OP (MD)No.2230/2022 by KMSJ).

...Petitioner/Intervener

in CRL MP(MD)No.4197/2022 For Petitioner : M/s. Joel Paul Antony.A.,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor (crl.side) For Intervenor : Mr.M.Sankar, Advocate in CRL MP(MD)No.4197/2022 PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.1 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.2230 of 2022 2.The case of the prosecution the petitioner and the de-facto complainant are friends. Due to financial situation of the petitioner's family, the de-facto complainant had given his credit card to the petitioner. The further allegation is that the petitioner had induced the de-facto complainant stating that if he give Rs.14 lakhs, he would pay double and had received Rs.14 lakhs and later, cheated him. Hence, the case.

3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen that the petitioner and the de-facto complainant are friends. Due to financial circumstances, the defacto complainant handed over his credit card to the petitioner and the petitioner, by using the same, had taken Rs.15,50,000/- and thereafter, failed to return the amount. Now the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has already been laid before the concerned Court. Therefore, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much necessary in this case. 5.Taking note of the serious allegations made against the petitioner and also the fact that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required in this case, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 08/03/2023 / TRUE COPY / /03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

SJI TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRUAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2230 of 2022 Date :08/03/2023 PKP/CG/SAR-3/23.03.2023/ 2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2