G.Vignesh v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2278 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2278 of 2020 G.Vignesh ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

1.State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

In Crime No.549 of 2017 2.Mohammed Ali Jinna ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in crime No.549 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.AK.Azagarsami For R1 : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R2 : Mr.K.Kathiresan

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.549 of 2017, on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences punishable under Sections 427, 295 IPC.

2.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by the Inspector of Police. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2278 of 2020 though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.549 of 2017.

5.It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs to the Credit of the Gandhi Memorial Museum and filed the original cash receipt along with this memo on 10.02.2020. The said submission is placed on record. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.549 of 2017, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Encl:Xerox copy of joint compromise memo gns To 1.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Dindigul District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.AK.AZAGARSAMY, Advocate ( SR-7117[F] dated 19/02/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2278 of 2020 18.02.2020 KM/(03.03.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2