Ahmed Jafran v. The State Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.2135 of 2025 and CRL. MP(MD)Nos.1467 & 1469 of 2025 Ahmed Jafran ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 vs.
1.The State rep. by the Sub Inspector of Police, AWPS, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram.
(Cr.No.2 of 2023) 2.Baisanabegam ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.21 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram and quash the same as far as this petitioner is concerned.
For petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed Page No. 1 of 5
For Respondents : Mr. M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl) for R1 Mr.A.Balaji for R2 *****
O R D E R
This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to the C.C.No.21 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram and quash the same.
2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner and defacto complainant are husband and wife. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No.2 of 2023. After investigation filed Final Report and the Trial Court has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 498(A), 406 IPC and Section 4 of Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Marriages Act, 2019, in C.C.No.19 of 2023.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.21 of 2023, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. Page No. 2 of 5
4. Today, the defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and the defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise as they are husband and wife. A compromise memo, dated 06.01.2025 signed by the parties, is also filed before this Court.
5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.
6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.
7. Recording the said compromise, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.21 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram is quashed. The compromise memo dated 06.01.2025 filed by the parties shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 06.02.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd Page No. 3 of 5
To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, AWPS, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Page No. 4 of 5
P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.2135 of 2025 06.02.2025 Page No. 5 of 5