Kaliammal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19055 of 2015 1 KALIAMMAL 2 KALIMUTHU 3 RAMAMOORTHY 4 LAKSHMANA MOORTHY 5 PALANIMURUGAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARALACHI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
(*)CRIME NO. 82 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S S.MUNIYANDI ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MRS.S.PRABHA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147,447,294(b),427 and 506(ii) of IPC in (*)Crime No.82 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute the petitioners said to have removed the stones put up by the de facto complainant and abused him in filthy language.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that no one has sustained injury and the case of the investigation is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one has sustained injury, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Magistrate, Aruppukottai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one common surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 06/10/2015 (*)Amended as per the order of this Hon`ble Court dated 06.11.2015 and made ion MP(MD)No.1/2015 in Crl.OP(MD)No.19055/2015.
/ TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI.
2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARALACHI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR.No. 65595
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19055 of 2015 Date :06/10/2015 2P/6C TE/GSV-PM/SAR-I 08/10/2015 RG.GSV-PM/SAR-I 19.11.2015 2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/