Tamilarasan v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.573 of 2019 TAMILARASAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADUKKUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.202/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody since 14.11.2018 for the offences punishable under Section 307 @ 302 of IPC in Crime No.202 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The petitioner and the deceased are close relatives. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute the petitioner assaulted the deceased with aruval, due to which the deceased sustained severe injuries and was taken to Government Hospital, there he died.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to vengeance with the petitioner and his family members a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He would also submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the investigation is pending and waiting for forensic report. He would also submit that eyewitnesses have been examined in this case.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and substantial portion of investigation is over and also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 11/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
2.DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICAIL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADUKKUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT,
4.THE SUPERINDENTENT, CENTRAL PRISION, TRICHY.
5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.680
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.573 of 2019 Date :11/01/2019 AE/JC/SAR4/11.01.2019/3P/7C