← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2140/2022ordered

Lakshmanan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-02-10Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/02/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Lakshmanan ... Petitioner/2nd Accused Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Mudukulathur Police Station, Ramnad District.

(Crime No.306/2021) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Adithya Vijayalayan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.306 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 324, 506(ii) I.P.C, in Cr.No.306 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to matrimonial dispute between the brother of the defacto complainant and sister of the first accused, on 26.08.2021, the accused persons had abused and attacked the brother of the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the present complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence and that a false case has been foisted against him. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the investigation is not yet completed, that the petitioner is not having any previous case at his credit and that the injured was discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts that there existed matrimonial dispute between the brother of the defacto complainant and sister of the first accused, that the injured was discharged from the hospital, that except the offence under Sections 506(ii) IPC, all other offences are bailable in nature and that the petitioner is not having any previous case for similar or serious offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 10/02/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUDUKULATHUR.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUDUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2140 of 2022 Date :10/02/2022 PNM MK/VR/SAR.III/21.02.2022/3P/5C 3/3