← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19140/2015allowed

Dinesh v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19140 of 2015 1 DINESH 2 NIRMAL 3 MANIKANDA PRABHU ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 304 OF 2015) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b),323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.304 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners have attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 06/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,RAMANATHAPURAM. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S R.MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.59147 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.19140 of 2015 Date :06/10/2015 PBK/AMF/SAR-II 08/10/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/