M.S. Saleem v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19196 of 2015 M.S. SALEEM ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNAMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI (CRIME NO. 295 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.S.HAROON RASHEED Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b),324,448 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.295 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive the petitioner trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant's house and abused him in filthy language and also attacked the de facto complainant. This is the case and counter case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 06/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI.

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNAMARAVATHI POLICE STATION,PUDUKKOTTAI.

+1. CC to M/S D.S.HAROON RASHEED Advocate SR.No.58708

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19196 of 2015 Date :06/10/2015 rg.07.10.2015/SK/SKN/ SAR-I 2P/6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/