Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19208/2015allowed

G. Marimuthu v. The Deputy Lsuperintendent Of

2015-10-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD)Nos.19208 & 19073 of 2015 G.MARIMUTHU ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.26 in Crl.OP(MD)No.19208/2015 1 THIRUPATHI 2 KUMAR @ MUTHUKUMAR 3 HEMA ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.21,22 & 25 in Crl.OP(MD)No.19073/2015 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING-II, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.2 OF 2013 RESPECTIVELY.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT in both the petitions For Petitioner : M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate in both the petitions For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) in both the petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A26, A21,A22 and A25 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police, in pursuance of the NonBailable Warrant issued on 02.09.2015, in connection with case in C.C.No.8 of 2015, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406,420,120(b),294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, and (*)Section 5 of TNPID Act, in Crime No. 2 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were regularly appearing before the trial Court and due to their ill health, they could not appear before the trial Court on 02.09.2015. He further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the trial Court for all future dates without bail.

3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Learned Special Court under the TNPID Act Cases, Madurai, and on each of them are executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judge concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court in connection with case in C.C.No.8 of 2015, for all future hearings without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Judge within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 06/10/2015 (*) Amended as per the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 26/11/2015 by VMVJ / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO To be substituted to the order already dispatched 1 THE SPECIAL JUDGE JUNDER THE TNPID ACT CASES, MADURAI. 2 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 3 THE DEPUTY LSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING-II, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+2. CC to M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.58704 & 58705 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD)Nos.19208 & 19073 of 2015 DATE :06/10/2015 PBK/SK-SKN/SAR-I 08/10/2015 ::2P-6C::

RG.AAL.MPA/SAR-I 26.11.2015 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/